Maybe it was only a matter of time.

Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, President Biden’s top medical adviser for the coronavirus pandemic, has tested positive for Covid-19 and is experiencing “mild symptoms,” the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases said Wednesday.

Dr. Fauci, the institute’s director, was positive on a rapid antigen test, the agency said in a statement. It added that he is fully vaccinated against the virus and has been boosted twice.

The 81-year-old Dr. Fauci has not recently been in close contact with President Biden or other senior government officials and would “isolate and continue to work from his home,” the statement said. He will return to his office once he tests negative. . .

[New York Times]

On Oct. 4, 2020, with Prof. Sunetra Gupta of Oxford University, we wrote the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD). Our purpose was to express our grave concerns over the inadequate protection of the vulnerable and the devastating harms of the lockdown pandemic policy adopted by much of the world; We proposed an alternative strategy of focused protection.

The key scientific fact on which the GBD was based—a more than thousand-fold higher risk of death for the old compared to the young—meant that better protection of the old would minimize COVID deaths. At the same time, opening schools and lifting lockdowns would reduce the collateral harm to the rest of the population.

The Declaration received enormous support, ultimately attracting signatures from over 50,000 scientists and medical professionals and over 800,000 members of the public. Our hope in writing was two-fold. First, we wanted to help the public understand that—contrary to the prevailing narrative—there was no scientific consensus in favor of lockdown. In this, we succeeded.

Second, we wanted to spur a discussion among public health scientists about how to better protect the vulnerable, both those living in nursing homes (where ~40 percent of all COVID deaths have occurred) and those living in the community. We provided specific proposals for focused protection in the GBD and supporting documents to spur the discussion. Though some in public health did engage civilly in productive discussions with us, in this aim we had limited success.

Unbeknownst to us, our call for a more focused pandemic strategy posed a political problem for Dr. Francis Collins and Dr. Anthony Fauci. The former is a geneticist who, until last week, was the director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH); the latter is an immunologist who directs the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). They are the biggest funders of medical and infectious disease research worldwide.

Collins and Fauci played critical roles in designing and advocating for the pandemic lockdown strategy adopted by the United States and many other countries. In emails written four days after the Great Barrington Declaration and disclosed recently after a FOIA request, it was revealed that the two conspired to undermine the Declaration. Rather than engaging in scientific discourse, they authorized “a quick and devastating published takedown” of this proposal, which they characterized as by “three fringe epidemiologists” from Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford.

[Full Article at Brownstone Institute]

It should be fun to see what excuses they come up with when comedians like Heather McDonald are dropping right on stage and fracturing their skulls in front of 20,000 people. I’m am confident they will think of something creative. This is getting interesting.

— Dr. James E. Olsson (@DrJamesOlsson) February 7, 2022

Comedian Heather McDonald delivered her second joke “I’m vaxxed, double vaxxed, boosted … and flu shot and shingle shot and haven’t gotten COVID and Jesus loves me most.”

“As soon as she delivered the joke, she just collapsed and hit her head on the floor.”

Instant karma?

— Paul Mitchell (@PaulMitchell_AB) February 6, 2022

Neil Young, considered by many Americans a thief of our music and an ‘innocent’ (read: ignorant) when it comes to understanding American culture and history, quits Spotify for allowing the public to be informed directly by world renowned experts and researchers who have successfully treated Covid-19 patients.

As just one example of appropriating American songs as his own, look at the Everly Brothers’ rendition of Sonny Curtis’, “Walk Right Back”. Rock and Roll ‘grandpa’ Neil Young takes it for granted his audience won’t know (read: “too stupid”) the Everly Brothers or Sonny Curtis when hearing, “Harvest Moon.”

“My hero then was Sonny Curtis … I admired him so much, I wanted to change my name to Sonny. I even tried to stand like him.”

Waylon Jennings

In all candor, Neil Young should get on his knees and kiss every American’s ass who’s lost a loved one or who has been harmed by the so called Covid-19 “Vaccine”.

Title: VAERS Data Confirm Myocarditis Risk After mRNA Vaccine

Date: January 27, 2022

Published: Physician’s Weekly

About: For nearly 40 years, Physician’s Weekly has been a trusted source of medical news and information for healthcare professionals at the point of care. Our unique wallboard publication—the cornerstone of our success—is located in over 30,000 top medical institutions and group practices in the country.

Editorial Board: 

• Linda Girgis, MD, FAAFP, Physician’s Weekly Editor-in-Chief, Family Physician in private practice, Clinical Assistant Professor, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
• Umbereen S. Nehal, MD, MPH, Board-certified pediatrician, Community representative for HHS Faith and Community Partnership Center. Former faculty for MIT Critical Data group. Former MIT Sloan Fellow.
• Alex McDonald, MD, FAAFP, CAQSM, Family and Sports Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Family Medicine Residency core Faculty, Clinical Professor Bernard J Tyson Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Co-Founder #ThisIsOurShot
• Don Dizon, MD, FACP, Medical oncologist and Professor of Medicine, Director of Women’s Cancers at Lifespan Cancer Institute, Director of Medical Oncology at Rhode Island Hospital, Chair of Digital Engagement for SWOG Oncology Research Network.
• Jasminka Criley, MD, FACP, FHM, Hospitalist, Internist, Private Practice, Consultant, Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, CEO & Co-founder, Indelible Learning Inc.

Here’s the American original. Listen to the riff.

Published: National Institutes of Health, April 8, 2021

Researcher: AMostafa Kamal Arefin

Title: Povidone Iodine (PVP-I) Oro-Nasal Spray: An Effective Shield for COVID-19 Protection for Health Care Worker (HCW), for all

Abstract: SARS- CoV-2 or novel coronavirus enters in human body through nose and mouth, stays there for a while. Then binds with ACE2 receptor, enters inside cell, multiply there and manifests. Again, Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone or Povidone Iodine (PVP-I) is a strong microbicidal agent having 99.99% virucidal efficacy in its only 0.23% concentration, irrespective of all known viruses, even in SARS- CoV-2 (in vitro). An oro-nasal spray is designed to apply the PVP-I in nose and oral cavity to gain a protective layer or coating over nasal and oral mucosa, so that SARS-CoV-2 can’t bind with the ACE-2 receptor and prevent their entry inside. So, it will be effective for prevention of COVID-19. Moreover, as PVP-I has the ability for destruction of SARS-CoV-2, transmission of SARS- CoV-2 from patient will be reduced also. Thus PVP-I oro-nasal spray can act as an effective shield for COVID-19 protection for healthcare workers, for all.

Background: . . . Here, an effective and safe Oro-Nasal Spray is designed to apply the PVP-I in nose and oral cavity to gain a protective layer or coating over nasal and oral mucosa, so that SARS-CoV-2 can’t bind with the ACE-2 receptor and prevent their entry inside. Thus it will be effective for prevention of COVID-19. Moreover, as PVP-I has the ability for destruction of SARS-CoV-2, transmission of SARS- CoV-2 will be reduced also . . .

Oro-Nasal Spray: . . . In Japan, 0.45% PVP-I throat spray is being used since long for prevention of cold and sore throat treatment. Gargling with PVP-I or spraying the throat with PVP-I is encouraged and included in their national respiratory guideline [9, 10]. . .

Safety of PVP-I Oro-Nasal sprays: Oral PVP-I gargle, throat spray, nasal spray formulations are currently available as over-the-counter medications in many countries, including Japan and Canada. PVP-I in low concentrations has not been known to stain teeth or to cause any major adverse effect. PVP-I oronasal spray should better to avoid in patients with iodine allergy or those undergoing radioiodine treatment or thyroid dysfunction. In a study PVP-I is proved ciliotoxic in concentrations of 5% and 10%, but not in proposed low concentration 8. . .

My Experience with PVP-I in COVID-19 Era: HCWs (Health Care Workers) of multiple hospitals or institutes of different parts of the world are using PVP-I in different form for protection from SARS-CoV-2. In Bangladesh authorities or individual doctors of Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, National Institute of ENT, Bangladesh ENT Hospital, ENT and Head Neck Cancer Hospital and most of the ENT, dental or maxillofacial related health care professionals adopted this policies in different extent. . .

Full Paper At The National Institutes of Health: “Povidone Iodine (PVP-I) Oro-Nasal Spray: An Effective Shield for COVID-19 Protection for Health Care Worker (HCW), for all“.

DOUBLE-JABBED Scots are now more likely to be admitted to hospital with Covid than the unvaccinated amid an increase in elderly people falling ill due to waning immunity.

It comes amid “weird” data showing that case rates have been lower in unvaccinated individuals than the single, double, or even triple-jabbed since Omicron became the dominant variant in Scotland, reports our sister title The Herald. . . .

Main points

• As at 09 January 2022, there have been 1,056,835 confirmed COVID-19 cases; 68,081 of these were recorded in the most recent week, a decrease of 40.4% from the previous week.
• There has been a 4.3% decrease in the number of Lateral Flow Device (LFD) asymptomatic tests carried out in the last week. There have been 19,303,280 LFD tests carried out in Scotland since 19 November 2020, of which 189,514 were positive (1.0%)
• In the week ending 02 January 2022, 126,737 individuals were recorded in the contact tracing software, from which 96,436 unique contacts have been traced. . . .

[Full January 12, 2022 Public Health Scotland Report]

On Saturday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Fox News Live,” Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) said that we need to know what was in the redacted portions of emails from White House Chief Medical Adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci discussing the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Malliotakis said, “Well, as I was going through some of the reporting on this issue, you may have noticed that the actual parts that talk about the connection to the Wuhan lab have been redacted. So first and foremost, I think we need to know what was in that redacted email that Fauci sent as it relates to Wuhan. Now, he seems to be changing his tune, and now, certainly, is also calling for a formal investigation.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

The lead author of a seminal paper promoting the theory that SARS-Co-V-2 evolved in nature deleted 5,000 tweets — and then his entire Twitter account on June 6 — after a trove of emails obtained by BuzzFeed News revealed the researcher, who originally believed the virus originated in a lab, changed his mind after corresponding with Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Emails show Dr. Kristian Andersen, author of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” published March 17, 2020 in Nature, was thanked by Fauci after he flipped his position on the origin of COVID. Five months later, Andersen received nearly $2 million in government funding for virus research.

The emails also show Fauci admitted masks are best suited for sick people to help stop the spread of the virus and are not effective in protecting healthy people from COVID, and that those who have had COVID have natural immunity, so they don’t need the vaccine.

1. Microbiologist flip flops on COVID origin theory, then gets millions in NIH funding

Private emails obtained by BuzzFeed via the Freedom of Information Act show Andersen,  professor of immunology and microbiology at Scripps Research Institute, told Fauci in an email on Feb.1, 2020, that SARS-CoV-2 has “unusual features” that “potentially look engineered.”

Two months later, Andersen reversed his position and published a paper stating COVID did not come from a lab and was not “a purposefully manipulated virus.”

Scientist Kristian Anderson told Fauci SARS-CoV-2 has “unusual features” that “potentially look engineered”.

Not long after this email, the scientists authored a piece insisting the virus was natural and Fauci said the same publicly. This is a massive cover-up.

(Buzzfeed FOIA) pic.twitter.com/BD3OUzgDzR

— Sharri Markson (@SharriMarkson) June 2, 2021

As The Defender reported last week, Andersen’s paper played a key role in shaping the mainstream media narrative that COVID evolved naturally, and also in making certain anyone who suggested the virus might have originated in a lab was branded a conspiracy theorist.

According to Gateway Pundit, Andersen’s paper helped protect Fauci, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is directed by Fauci, from “potential probes” into those agencies’ funding of controversial gain-of-function virus research.

Five months after the paper was published, Andersen received $1.88 million from the NIH to fund Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases, a global network of emerging infectious disease research that studies pathogen transmission, immune system responses and pathogen/host surveillance.

Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance received $1.54 million in gain-of-function research funding. Daszak is a virus hunter and mastermind behind a “bullying” letter signed by 27 scientists attacking anyone who challenged the narrative, established by Andersen’s paper, that COVID originated in nature.

2 months later he reverses course and publishes his “Proximal Origin” paper, helping shield NIH/NIAID from potential probes into its GOF funding.

5 months after that, he gets $1.88 million in CREID funding, along with Daszak who gets $1.54 million more.https://t.co/PFPIMxZd7o pic.twitter.com/7JmapgRNTm

— Radical Centrist, wrathful tantric deity (@RadCentrism) June 2, 2021

After his emails with Fauci went public, Andersen deleted 5,000 tweets. Andersen’s account was no longer accessible on June 6, according to the internet archive The Wayback Machine, Newsweek reported.

This is a lie, because all tweets preceding March 7th, 2021 are deleted. This isn’t some tool to auto-delete tweets after n time elapses… pic.twitter.com/JMS9PcFLiw

— CHT (@PrometheusAM) June 6, 2021

2. Fauci tells U.S. Department of Health and Human Services secretary masks are only for the sick — but tells public something else

According to the BuzzFeed emails, in February 2020, Fauci did not believe paper masks — the kind sold at drugstores and worn by millions — protected healthy people from catching COVID. Instead, Fauci told Sylvia Burwell, former U.S. Department of Health and Human Services secretary:

“Masks are really for infected people to protect them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.”

The truth about masks. We were right. Fauci knew from the start that masks aren’t really effective in keeping out virus because the virus “is small enough to pass through the material.” #Fauciemails pic.twitter.com/1l3bX7AINh

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) June 2, 2021

That statement in Fauci’s private emails is far different than what he told the American public, which was that everyone may need to mask up until 2022, to stay protected from COVID and its variants.

3. Fauci admits people who have had COVID have ‘substantial immunity’ 

When oncologist Dr. Zeke Emanuel, former health advisor to then-President Barack Obama and a former member of Bill Clinton’s Health Care Task Force, asked Fauci via email if people who have recovered from COVID are immune to getting the virus again, Fauci replied:

“No evidence in this regard, but you would assume that there would be substantial immunity post infection.”

If people who have recovered from COVID have natural immunity to the virus, that would mean they don’t need to be vaccinated for it. Yet Fauci told Americans something very different when he said people who have had COVID still need to get the vaccine.

Fauci said people who have had COVID should get at least one dose of the vaccine. He also said people who have already had COVID should get one dose of the vaccine because they may have more protection from “highly contagious variants.”

The post 3 Ways Fauci Emails Expose Trail of Manipulation and Deception appeared first on Children’s Health Defense.

For more than a year and a half, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) unlawfully stalled on my request for Dr. Anthony Fauci’s emails. (The law requires the records to be produced within about 30 days.) Federal agencies frequently violate Freedom of Information (FOI) law with impunity. Initially, NIH provided emails to only selected media […]

House Oversight Committee Republicans released emails showing American public health officials – including National Institutes of Health leaders Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins – downplaying COVID-19 potentially having a lab origin despite internal conference calls concluding the theory was viable.

Following the release of the emails, the group requested a “transcribed interview” with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci in a letter to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra.

“Excerpts of emails we are making public today reveal that Dr. Fauci was warned of two things: (1) the potential that COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute Virology (WIV) and (2) the possibility that the virus was intentionally genetically manipulated,” notes the letter signed by Committee on Oversight and Reform Ranking Member James Comer and Committee on the Judiciary Ranking Member Jim Jordan.

The post Fauci Emails Describe COVID Natural Origins Theory As ‘Highly Unlikely’ Despite Public Denials. appeared first on The National Pulse..

Published: National Institutes of Health, June 1, 2020

Researchers: Arturo Armone Caruso,^a Antonio Del Prete,^b and Antonio Ivan Lazzarino^c,⁎

Title: Hydrogen peroxide and viral infections: A literature review with research hypothesis definition in relation to the current covid-19 pandemic

Abstract: We reviewed the literature concerning the innate response from nasal and oral epithelial cells and their reaction to hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). . . .

Methods: We searched the databases EMBASE and PubMed for relevant papers using the following entry terms: (“hydrogen peroxide” OR H2O2) AND (virus OR viral infection OR innate response). We have not used any other constrains. After duplicates were removed, we identified 2119 papers. . . .

Results: Moreover, a hydrogen peroxide solution of a concentration as little as 0.5% efficiently inactivates coronaviruses (e.g. SARS, MERS) on inanimate surfaces within 1 min [22]. This may justify the use of hydrogen peroxide washes in infected people too: the solution may decrease the viral load of their respiratory droplets, hence help tackle the spread in the community. . .

Conclusions: There are no randomized controlled trials or clinical observational studies concerning the curative or preventive effect of hydrogen peroxide against viral infections. However, the literature from in-vitro immunological studies clearly points out that the application of hydrogen peroxide on the epithelial cells of nose, throat and mouth may well be extremely effective against viruses, including coronaviruses. We strongly encourage the rapid development of randomized controlled trials in both SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative subjects to study the effects that we have hypothesized.

Full Paper At The National Institutes of Health: “Hydrogen peroxide and viral infections: A literature review with research hypothesis definition in relation to the current covid-19 pandemic“.

Unknown to the general public is the vast use of food grade hydrogen peroxide and iodine for the treatment of viral and bacterial infections. It’s use is so prevalent, the NIH has a published paper that reviewed 2119 peer reviewed papers and came to the conclusion that, “There are no randomized controlled trials or clinical observational studies concerning the curative or preventive effect of hydrogen peroxide against viral infections. However, the literature from in-vitro immunological studies clearly points out that the application of hydrogen peroxide on the epithelial cells of nose, throat and mouth may well be extremely effective against viruses, including coronaviruses. We strongly encourage the rapid development of randomized controlled trials in both SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative subjects to study the effects that we have hypothesized.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262503/

There are certain doctors who are blowing the whistle on the ways our government has handled Covid-19. It seems that the only advice coming out of DC or otherwise is to get vaccinated. Any treatments or preventative measures are either ignored or outright discouraged. Everyone remembers the false notion that Ivermectin is just a “horse dewormer” despite the fact that it has been used by humans since long before Covid-19 ever existed.

One doctor who is spreading the truth is Dr. Peter McCullough. He has been censored and attacked for doing so. He has taken considerable losses for his adherence to the truth, but he persists. I was blessed to have him on my show. Among many other important topics, he discussed the six things everyone should have on hand as Omicron spreads.

As a very clear disclaimer, we are NOT recommending the following nutraceuticals as “treatments” for Covid-19. You’ll need to consult your doctor for that. But all of these have demonstrated efficacy in fighting or preventing the disease, particularly Omicron. It would also behoove us all for me to mention that four of the six items listed by Dr. McCullough are available through Dr. Zev Zelenko’s Z-Stack protocol. Use promo code “Freedom” if you do decide to purchase it. I take it daily myself.

With that said, here is what Dr. McCullough had to say about the six things to keep in your medical toolbox:

“If there was six things in the over-the-counter toolbox, I would put in there that Povidone Iodine. That’s about $5 if you buy it online. And then after that it would be Zinc, 50 mg a day. Vitamin D, 5,000 IUs a day, increased to 20,000 a day during active treatment. Vitamin C, 3,000 mg a day, active treatment. And then Quercetin, 500 mg a day for prevention, 500 mg per day for active treatment. And then one last one, which is over-the-counter antacid/antihistamine which actually reduces viral replication and that’s Famotidine or Pepcid, but at a high dose, 80 mg a day active treatment.

“So that over-the-counter list, if there was a shopping list if people were going to, in a sense, ‘brace themselves’ for Omicron, which it looks like it’s going to hit everybody.”

He then went on to describe the prescription drugs that many are taking to treat Covid-19 such as Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, among others.

This intriguing interview is a must-listen for anyone who wants to know how things are going with Omicron and what to expect in the future.