Election 2020

One Of The Most Disputed Elections In History

Why So Many Jews Vote for Democrats–And How to Change That

AP Photo/Kathy Willens
As a rabbi, the question I am asked the most by my Christian friends, pastors, and at the churches where I have spoken is ironically not a theological question, but a political one: Why do so many Jews continually support leftist causes, organizations, and the Democratic Party when it is clear that they are against Israel, Judaism, and religion in general?  Because of the importance of unifying all people of faith politically in these challenging times, it seems appropriate to address this issue and to determine how to fix it.

It is objectively true that the Democratic Party has become the party of institutionalized anti-Semitism and is clearly anti-Israel as well. Leftist organizations such as Black Lives Matter are committed to the destruction of Israel and the persecution of Jews.  And although most Republicans and those on the right support Israel and religion, it is also objectively true that the vast majority of American Jews support the left.

There are a number of reasons why Jews typically support the left and vote Democrat. Some are historical. The modern state of Israel was founded during the Democratic administration of Harry Truman, and many Jews believe (incorrectly) that it was Democratic support that created Israel. (In fact, Truman was “a reluctant Cyrus but pro-Israel).  When Jews were being persecuted in Russia in the early 20th century, and again in Germany in the 1930s, they were welcomed into the United States as legal immigrants. Proudly they would study and ultimately receive American citizenship after coming from countries where they never enjoyed the rights of full citizens. Whether by choice or pressure, the United States under a Democratic administration supported Israel in the Six Day War, and Congress was supportive of Jewish causes and Israel.

There were also theological reasons to support the left. For thousands of years, Judaism has been concerned with the wellbeing of the weak and downtrodden. There was a time when unions were needed to protect against child labor and sweatshops, and Jews resonated with these causes. The Jewish values of free will and individual responsibility fit in well with many of the social causes of the left in the 1960s and 1970s. Jews were at the forefront of the civil rights movement. Great rabbis like Abraham Joshua Heschel were intimately involved with the work of Dr. Martin Luther King, and Jews were early supporters of the creation of the NAACP.

But all of these historical reasons are no longer valid, and haven’t been for over 40 years. Starting with Jimmy Carter, the left’s support of Israel has declined. The Democratic Party has now been taken over by vocal anti-Semites like “the squad,” and BLM is the violent arm of the Democrats. Conversely, President Trump was the most pro-Israel/pro-Jewish president in history (and has an Orthodox Jewish daughter and grandchildren); the Republican Party is constantly supporting Israel; and anti-Semitic individuals and groups are rejected from the mainstream of the Republican Party, as opposed to the Democratic Party, which embraces anti-Semites.

So why do Jews continue to support the Democrats and the left? . . . .

Full Story -->
Show Me

Judge Sanctions 9 Trump Campaign Attorneys Over Election Lawsuit

A federal judge in Michigan on Aug. 25 sanctioned Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, and seven other attorneys who represented the Trump campaign in a lawsuit challenging the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

U.S. District Judge Linda Parker, an Obama appointee, referred the nine attorneys for investigation and possible disbarment or suspension by relevant state authorities. Parker also ordered the sanctioned individuals to pay the court fees tied to the election lawsuit and to take legal education classes.

“This lawsuit represents a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process,” Parker wrote in a 110-page opinion (pdf). “It is one thing to take on the charge of vindicating rights associated with an allegedly fraudulent election. It is another to take on the charge of deceiving a federal court and the American people into believing that rights were infringed, without regard to whether any laws or rights were in fact violated.”

The attorney representing seven of the sanctioned lawyers, including Powell and Wood, didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment. . . .

Full Story -->
Show Me

Court Rules Judicial Watch Lawsuit Can Proceed against Colorado Officials to Force Cleanup of State’s Voter Rolls

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a federal court ruled its lawsuit can proceed against Colorado officials to force a cleanup of the state’s voter rolls.

Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit October 5, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado on behalf of itself and three residents of Colorado against Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State, and the State of Colorado for failing to clean the state’s voter rolls as required by the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).

The court’s recent ruling to allow Judicial Watch’s claims to proceed came after Colorado’s motion to dismiss the case, which the court denied in all key respects.

The court ruled that the individual plaintiffs have standing to sue based on the fact that “noncompliance with the NVRA undermines the individual plaintiffs’ confidence in the integrity of the electoral process and discourages their participation [in elections].”

In his ruling, Chief District Judge Philip A. Brimmer also ruled that Judicial Watch’s allegations about Colorado’s voting lists were enough to allow the lawsuit to proceed:

[Judicial Watch’s] claims that the Secretary is not complying with the NVRA are based on public records and statistical analysis. Plaintiffs insist that they have shown not only high registration rates, which they claim courts have found indicative of an NVRA violation, but also that the Secretary sends too few Confirmation Notices, removes too few registrants, and has too high a number of inactive voters on the rolls. . . . [T]he Court finds that plaintiffs have met their burden and have plausibly alleged that Colorado’s list maintenance program does not comply with the NVRA.

In its lawsuit against Colorado Judicial Watch argues:

  • A 2019 study showed that 40 of Colorado’s 64 counties had voter registration rates exceeding 100% of the eligible citizen voting-age population. The share of Colorado counties with registration rates exceeding 100% was the highest in the nation.
  • Data Colorado itself provided to the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) showed that Colorado was lagging in the processing and removal of certain classes of ineligible registrations belonging to those who had moved out of state.
  • In the last two years, 60 of Colorado’s 64 counties had a higher percentage of inactive registrations than the national median.
  • In eight Colorado counties, more than one in six registrations belonged to an inactive voter.

Judicial Watch notes that registration rates over 100%, poor processing of out-of-date registrations, and high levels of inactive registrations “indicate an ongoing, systemic problem with Colorado’s voter list maintenance efforts.” Colorado’s “failure to comply with their … voter list maintenance obligations” injures lawfully registered voters by “undermining their confidence in the integrity of the electoral process, discouraging their participation in the democratic process, and instilling in them the fear that their legitimate votes will be nullified or diluted.”

Judicial Watch has asked the court to declare that Colorado and its Secretary of State are violating the NVRA and to order them to “develop and implement a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the registrations of ineligible registrants from the voter rolls in Colorado …”

“Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections. And this court victory highlights how Colorado citizens and voters have a right to expect that the state’s voting rolls are reasonably kept up to date, as federal law requires,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

Judicial Watch is a national leader for cleaner elections.

In 2020, Judicial Watch also sued North Carolina and Pennsylvania for failing to clean their voter rolls.

In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld a voter-roll cleanup program that resulted from a Judicial Watch settlement of a federal lawsuit with Ohio. California settled a federal lawsuit with Judicial Watch and in 2019 began the process of removing up to 1.6 million inactive names from Los Angeles County’s voter rolls.

Kentucky also began a cleanup of hundreds of thousands of old registrations after it entered into a consent decree to end another Judicial Watch lawsuit. In September of last year, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky agreed to extend the consent decree through 2025 after finding that that Kentucky’s former Democrat Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grime breached its terms by delaying sending out voter notices, which allowed the names of people who have died or moved away to remain on the Commonwealth’s voter rolls.

In September 2020, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Illinois Conservative Union (ICU) and three of its officers, after Illinois state officials refused to allow them to obtain a copy of the state’s voter registration database. In June 2021, a federal court ruled the lawsuit could proceed.

In October 2020, Judicial Watch released a study that found 353 counties nationwide that had more voter registrations than citizens old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration rates exceed 100%. These counties combined had about 1.8 million registrations over the 100%-registered mark.

Judicial Watch’s 2019 study found 378 counties nationwide that had more voter registrations than citizens old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million registrations over the 100%-registered mark.

Judicial Watch Attorney Robert Popper is the director of Judicial Watch’s clean elections initiative.  Judicial Watch is assisted by John Zakhem of Jackson Kelly PLLC in Denver, Colorado. . . .

Full Story -->
Show Me

How, Who and Why Election 2020 Was Stolen As Explained By Retired Colonel Phil Waldron, U.S. Army | Video: 22 Minutes 54 Seconds

Show Me

President Donald Trump Rally Full Speech in Cullman, AL 8/21/21 | 1 Hour 35 Minutes 58 Seconds

Show Me

Mike Lindell: It’s Not Trump 2024, It’s Trump 2021! | Video: 1 Minute 3 Seconds

Show Me

Exclusive: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated – sources

WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) – The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.

“Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,” said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. “Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.”

Stone, a veteran Republican operative and self-described “dirty trickster”, and Jones, founder of a conspiracy-driven radio show and webcast, are both allies of Trump and had been involved in pro-Trump events in Washington on Jan. 5, the day before the riot.

FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said. . . .

Full Story -->
Show Me

Judicial Watch: U.S. Capitol Police Tell Federal Court January 6 Disturbance Videos Are Not Public Records

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today the U.S. Capitol Police seeks to shut down a public records lawsuit for January 6 disturbance video and emails by arguing to a federal court that the requested are “not public records.”

Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in February 2021 under the common law right of access to public records after the Capitol Police refused to provide any records in response to a January 21, 2021, request for:

  • Email communications between the U.S. Capitol Police Executive Team and the Capitol Police Board concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021 through January 10, 2021.
  • Email communications of the Capitol Police Board with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021 through January 10, 2021.
  • All video footage from within the Capitol between 12 pm and 9 pm on January 6, 2021.

Regarding withholding the videos, the Capitol Police told the court:

The USCP’s camera security system, including footage recorded by it within the Capitol and sought by [Judicial Watch], is solely for national security and law enforcement purposes.

Access to video footage from the USCP’s camera security system is limited to narrow circumstances and strictly controlled by USCP policy.

The USCP has not made any public disclosures of video footage from January 6 from its camera security system.

There are currently pending criminal investigations and prosecutions of individuals involved in the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

There are currently pending congressional investigations into the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

In its motion, the Capitol Police also argues the case should be closed because, among other assertions, even if the records Judicial Watch asks for are “public records,” the USCP’s interests in confidentiality “outweigh any public interest in those materials.”

It also claims not to have access to many of the emails sought by Judicial Watch.

“To cut to the chase, the US Capitol Police is hiding a reported 14,000 hours of January 6 video from the American people to help Nancy Pelosi’s abusive targeting of Trump supporters and other political opponents,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Any other police department in America would be investigated and defunded for such abusive secrecy. The Pelosi Congress is in cover-up mode regarding January 6.”

Judicial Watch is conducting an extensive investigation into the January 6 events in Washington, DC.

Earlier this month, Judicial Watch uncovered documents from Washington, DC’s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) related to Air Force veteran and San Diego native Ashli Babbitt. These documents reveal that OCME submitted a request for permission to cremate Babbitt only two days after taking custody of her body and that due to the “high profile nature” of Babbitt’s case, Deputy Chief Medical Examiner Francisco Diaz requested that a secure electronic file with limited access be created for Babbitt’s records. Additionally, Babbitt’s fingerprints were emailed to a person supposedly working for the DC government, which resulted in Microsoft “undeliverable” messages written in Chinese characters being returned.

In July, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA lawsuit against the DOJ for records of communication between the FBI and several financial institutions about the reported transfer of financial transactions made by people in DC, Maryland and Virginia on January 5 and January 6, 2021. The FBI refused to confirm or deny any such records exist. Also in July, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) for information relating to the tracking and collecting of Americans’ social media posts through its Internet Covert Operations Program (iCOP).

In May, Judicial Watch sued both the Department of the Interior and the Department of Defense for records regarding the deployment of armed forces around the Capitol complex in Washington, D.C., in January and February of 2021.

In March, Judicial Watch sued the District of Columbia for the autopsy of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick and related records. Pressure from this lawsuit helped lead to the disclosure that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes. Also in March, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense for records about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s January 8, 2021, telephone call with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley. . . .

Full Story -->
Show Me

Stunning Poll Reveals Trump Would Win Election Held Today, as Nearly 1 in 10 Democrats ‘Regret’ Their 2020 Vote.

Stunning new poll numbers from Rasmussen Reports suggest nearly 1 in 10 Democrats regret their vote in the 2020 Presidential election, with 12 percent of ‘Moderates’ saying the same, and 14 percent of Black Americans expressing regret. 

Furthermore, asked how people would vote if a presidential election were held today, just 37 percent said they would vote for Joe Biden, down from 45 percent who said they did. Forty-three percent said they would vote for Donald Trump.

The Rasmussen Reports numbers shine a new light on just how poorly Joe Biden has performed in his first few months as President of the United States. . . .

Full Story -->
Show Me

‘Joe’s leading lambs to slaughter’: Trump tears into Biden for abandoning Afghans to the Taliban 

‘Joe’s leading lambs to slaughter’: Trump tears into Biden for abandoning Afghans to the Taliban and says fall of Kabul was a ‘coup of incompetent people’ and makes the border ‘look like baby food’

  • Trump attacked Biden’s ‘disaster’ foreign policy in his second Fox interview within 12 hours and said Biden’s bad decisions began ‘when he was born’
  • The former president spoke with Fox Business’s Maria Bartiromo on Wednesday
  • He said the Taliban are ‘great negotiators’ and ‘naturally tough’ but insisted Biden ‘let them gain 19 steps out of 20’ in their takeover of Afghanistan
  • He suggested that Biden should have bombed US military bases after leaving
  • In an interview with Sean Hannity, Trump said he told Mullah Baradar his village would be attacked if the Taliban failed to stick to a peace deal
  • He said the problem was not leaving Afghanistan but ‘the way they withdrew’
  • And he condemned Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, said he had no faith in him and blasted: ‘He spent all of this time wining and dining our senators’
  • It comes as Taliban turned their guns on Afghans trying to flee to Kabul airport
  • Trump has kept up a running commentary on Joe Biden’s handling of the crisis. . . .
Full Story -->
Show Me

How to Stay Positive When the News Cycle is Negative

January 15, 2020
FBI arrests former U.S. Special Forces soldier, Antifa leader & Joe Biden voter, Daniel Allen Baker, in alleged plot to carry out violence at Florida Capitol Against Trump Supporters & Police.

"BAKER has traveled across the United States to participate in protests that have resulted in violence to include joining the CHOP/CHAZ movement in Seattle, Washington during the summer of 2020." ~ Daniel Baker Criminal Complaint, Page 4

US Attorney Keefe's Video Statement Below

Black Lives Matter & Insurgence USA Leader, John Sullivan, Arrested On Federal Charges In DC Riots. Released Conditionally January 15, 2020 Without Bail By Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Of The United States District Court For The District Of Utah. (Click Here.)

"In many ways, this election was stolen."
~ Senator Rand Paul

Peter Navarro Continues To Lay Out The Systematic Way In Which He Concludes Votes Were Illegally Awarded To Joe Biden In Election 2020

Volume III Released
January 14, 2020

Peter Navarro Is Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy

Impeachment Resolution Against Donald Trump Passes

"Even If Biden Wins, We Go For All Republican Voters, & Homeland Security Will Take Their Children Away. . . (If Biden Doesn't Win) Go To The White House & Throw Molotov Cocktails. . . Could You Imagine If You Lived In One Of These Other Towns Or States Where Everybody's Just Stupid? What's Great Is Covid Is Spiking In All The Red States, Right Now. So, That's Great. . . Because Either Those People Won't Come Out To Vote For Trump. . . Or A Lot Of Them Are Sick & Dying. "
~ Michael Beller, Principal Counsel, PBS As Recorded By Project Veritas

Michael Beller Has Been Fired

HYPOCRISY

Definition of hypocrisy

1 a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess.
2 a pretense of having some desirable or publicly approved attitude.
3 : an act or instance of hypocrisy.

Gaslighting Is The Attempt To Make A Population Believe They Are Going Insane (As By Subjecting Them To A Series Of Experiences That Have No Rational Explanation). Just Days After BLOCKING & Banning President Donald Trump, Hundreds Of Thousands Of Americans & ANY DISCUSSION OF FRAUD IN THE 2020 ELECTION, Twitter Claims That, "Access to information and freedom of expression, including the public conversation on Twitter, is never more important than during democratic processes, particularly elections," After Uganda Blocks & Bans Social Media Ahead Of The Uganda Election.

"Our Election Was Hijacked. There Is No Question. Congress Has A Duty To #ProtectOurDemocracy & #FollowTheFacts." ~ On May 16, 2017, Nancy Pelosi Continued To Falsely Claim That Donald Trump's Election Was Fraudulent As Protests & Riots Swept The Nation After President Trump's Historic Victory

The Mainstream Media & Big Tech Have Been Stoking The Flames of Violence For Many Years When It Suited Their Ideological Ends. Particularly Egregious Was The Year 2020.
"And Please Show Me Where It Says That Protests Are Supposed To Be Polite and Peaceful?" ~ CNN, Chris Cuomo

Video: 18 Seconds

"Joe Biden Should Not Concede Under Any Circumstances!" ~ Hillary Clinton On How Candidate Joe Biden Should Respond If He Had Lost Election 2020

Video: 13 Seconds

"Everyone Beware. . . Because They're Not Going To Stop. . . They're Not Going To Stop Before Election Day In November & They're Not Going To Stop After Election Day. . . They're Not Going To Let Up & They Should not." ~ Kamala Harris Discussing The Protests Throughout The United States That Had Already Killed At Least 17 Americans and Injured Over 900 Police Officers By July 26, 2020

Democrats Object to Counting Electoral College Votes in 2000 and 2004

Video: 2 Minutes 20 Seconds

Washington Post's Trump Phone Call Release Leaves Raffensperger's Lie About Data Unchallenged and Matt Braynard Open For Doxing While Deleting Portions Of Audio Unfriendly To Democrats In 'Full Recording'.

Video: 3 Minutes 1 Second

Life Long Democrat & Georgia Representative Vernon Jones Saw It Coming Months Before It Happened

"We Left The White House . . . Only To Be Met By A Violent Mob Of Supporters of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. These Were Democrats, Black Lives Matter, Antifa Folks. . . Let Me Be Clear: My Life Was Threatened. And Others Lives Were Threatened. And When I Hear That Foolishness From The Liberal Media That It Was Mostly Peaceful, Where In The Hell Were They When My Life Was Threatened and Others Lives Were Threatened? Thank God For The Police Officers. If This Had Been The Other Way Around . . . It Would Have Been All Over The Networks." ~ Democrat Georgia Representative, Vernon Jones

Joint Session of Congress Counts Electoral College Votes
Names Joe Biden President Elect At 3:42 am Eastern Time
January 7, 2021

UNDERSTANDING THE ELECTORAL CHALLENGE

"It's my intention to fight to protect our republic. And the underlying foundation of any republic is the right to vote and to have that vote accurately counted with this emphasis point: we should only count lawful votes cast by eligible American citizens and nobody else and that is clearly not happening in the United States of America right now." ~ United States Senator Mo Brooks

Video: 31 Minutes 31 Seconds

Louis Gohmert Explains His Electoral College Lawsuit

Video: 30 Minutes

Georgia Senate Hearing On Election 2020
Recorded December 30, 2020

Evening News Rebroadcast
"In Many Ways This Election Was Stolen" ~ Senator Rand Paul
Senate Hearing Makes It Clear Mainstream Media Is Falsely Claiming Voter Fraud Is Baseless

December 16, 2020

Dominion Voting Systems CEO Testifies At Michigan Legislature Hearing.

He Testifies That Claims Against Dominion Are 'Baseless'. Concedes Dominion Cannot Be Used For Election Audits. Actual Hand Counts Using Paper Ballots Must Be Used.

December 15, 2020
Recorded 1 pm Eastern

"The Following is a breakdown of the votes tabulated for the 2020 election in Antrim County, showing different dates for tabulation of the same votes."

Nov 3 12,423
Nov 5 17,327
Nov 21 15,949

Georgia State Farm Arena Surveillance Video Showing That Counting Continued Out Of Sight From Public & Media Using Ballots From Previously Hidden Boxes Debunking Public Statements From Georgia Election Officials, The Georgia Governor & The Georgia Secretary Of State

First Shown Publicly Thursday, December 3, 2020
Video 49 Minutes 40 Seconds

After A Day Of CNN Declaring No Voter Fraud & Exactly Five Minutes After 'Breaking News' Of AG Barr's Statement He Had Not Yet Seen Widespread Voter Fraud, Doctor Linda Lee Tarver, Thirty Four Year Civil Servant, Former Civil Rights Commissioner & Seven Year Election Integrity Liaison Explains The Widespread Targeted Voter Fraud In Michigan & Throughout United States' Urban Centers. She Also Explains Why White Officials Have Not Stepped In To Solve The Problem. In The Video Below, See CNN's Take On Election Fraud & AG Barr's Statement Followed By Doctor Tarver's Discussion On The Ongoing Ways Elections Are Actually Being Stolen.

"How Do You Have A Pristine Flat Ballot Without Being Folded If It Was An Absentee Ballot?"

~ Dr. Tarver

Initially Given 3 Minutes To Address The Issue, The Panel of Republicans and Democrats Kept Her In Discussion For Over 30 Minutes

Video: 37 Minutes 14 Seconds
* The Cut In Video When Janice Winfrey Is Mentioned Standing Next To Ballots Appears In The YouTube RECORDING After It Was Streamed Live. *

Canada Has Never Used & Apparently Will Never Use Dominion Voting Systems.

Threats Continue To Be Leveled Against All The Women & Families Involved In The Election 2020 Dispute.

The New York Times, Ahead Of The 2020 Election, Demonstrated How To Rig An Election Using Voting Machines . . . In Michigan

Video: 4 Minutes 23 Seconds

Dominion Voting Systems Refuse To Be Placed Under Oath & Abruptly Cancel Their Pennsylvania Public Hearing Appearance For November 20, 2020

Video: 2 Minutes 49 Seconds

Sidney Powell laid out a much broader web of voter fraud that has been difficult to verify. "Where is that evidence? The more she goes out there, the more it overshadows the legitimate problems. … The problem with this stuff is that you got so over-the-top, and you overshadow the illegitimate improper things that were done." The Washington Examiner explains the evidentiary issues with her specific claims

However, New York's Democrat Representative Carolyn Maloney pointed out the exact same issues in 2006, Hugo Chavez and all. It appears, Sidney Powell's point was not that Hugo Chavez was still alive. Her point was that the voting machine is made in China and it was under Chavez' direction that the software was written to flip votes thereby overturning the legitimate winner of an election, as demonstrated by the New York Times voting machine test, above.

In "Democracy For Sale", CNN & New York's Current 12th Congressional District Democrat Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney Pointed Out As Far Back As 2006 The Problems With Smartmatic/Sequoia & Ongoing Direct Foreign Influence In Our Elections Via Voting Machines. And Yes, It Involved Hugo Chavez and Venezuela. Smartmatic/Sequoia Sold Sequoia To Dominion On June 4, 2010.

Video: 4 Minutes 6 Seconds

In the video below, Representative Zoe Lofgren (Democrat, California) and Representative Marcia Fudge (Democrat, Ohio) question Dominion on January 9, 2020.

“Lawrence Norden of the Brennan Center for Justice wrote in his testimony that, and I quote, ‘There are more Federal regulations for ball point pens and magic markers than there are for voting systems and other parts of election infrastructure.’”

Representative Zoe Lofgren, (D) California

Video: 9 Minutes 11 Seconds

Election 2020 Lawsuits & Pleadings Continue

Top lawyers throughout the country are still fighting in all six battleground states against what they view as a stolen election whose true winner, Donald Trump, was overturned the day after the election through fraud. Most of these lawsuits are independently filed and not part of the Trump legal team.

Former Kansas Attorney General, Phill Klein, Is Filing Lawsuits In All Battleground States Claiming Voter Fraud & Violation Of The Equal Protection Clause, In Large Part Through Mark Zuckerberg's Donation. Mark Zuckerberg Admitted Giving $400,000,000 To Election Officials During His Congressional Testimony After The 2020 Election.

Video: 2 Minutes 28 Seconds

Since Election Night The Presidential Winner Has Been In Dispute. Rudy Giuliani's Press Conference On November 19, 2020, Explains The Issues In Question.

QUICK READS - BELOW ARE EXCERPTS BY TOPIC

Great Bloggers is commited to giving information that the public can use to understand the issues at hand. Primary sources, when possible, and good discussions and studies when informative.

1

Rudy Giuliani Discusses How Mail-In Voting Laid The Groundwork For Voter Fraud With Specific Examples and Concerns.

Video: 4 Minutes 19 Seconds

2

Rudy Giuliani Discusses Direct Evidence of Different Standards For Different Voters, Violating The Equal Protection Clause.

Video: 9 Minutes 6 Seconds

3

Rudy Giuliani Discusses Threats Against The President's Lawyers and Their Families As Well As The Blatant Disregard Of The United States Supreme Court Order Through Backdated Ballots.

Video: 8 Minutes 3 Seconds

4

Rudy Giuliani Discusses "Food Trucks" Delivering Trash Cans & Bags Of Thousands Of Ballots In The Early Morning After Election Day - Observed As All Biden Votes.

Video: 4 Minutes 44 Seconds

5

Rudy Giuliani Discusses Donald Trump's Landslide Win & Overvotes With Some Vote Counts Higher Than The Entire Population In Some Areas

Video: 5 Minutes 2 Seconds

6

"We Cannot Let This Happen To Us. We Cannot Allow These Crooks, Because That's What They Are, To Steal An Election From The American People. They Elected Donald Trump. They Didn't Elect Joe Biden. Joe Biden Is In The Lead Because Of The Fraudulent Ballots, The Illegal Ballots That Were Produced And That Were Allowed To Be Used After The Election Was Over."

~ Rudy Giuliani

Video: 5 Minutes 33 Seconds

Since Election Night The Presidential Winner Has Been In Dispute. Here is Rudy Giuliani's Full Press Conference On November 19, 2020.

Video: 1 Hour 31 Minutes