Guest post by Niall McCrae
An unremarkable Turkish café-takeaway in London, with its slowly turning rolls of doner lamb and chicken, was a strange setting for the meeting. Graham Phillips, a YouTube journalist, had organised a fund-raising event at a hall in Islington, seeking contributions for a drone and other equipment. He had briefly returned from the Donbas region of Ukraine, where the government was using military force to suppress an alleged separatist movement. This was an untold story in Western mainstream media, and Phillips wanted to do more than basic recordings with his mobile phone. He also wanted to encourage others to come out to Donetsk, where he was based, to see and share the reality.
However, Ukrainian nationalists heard about this, and the hall owner cancelled the booking. A sign on the door redirected people to a nearby pub, where Phillips was intending to use the function room. This too was stopped when the landlord received threats. And so those who remained gathered in the kebab shop. It was a mixed crowd: Eurosceptics, Stop the War activists, Russian emigrants – and possibly MI6. Phillips began his address, showing photographs of dead or injured civilians, but was heckled by a smartly-dressed man shouting: ‘those people are terrorists’. Phillips demanded that he leave, and the two adversaries almost came to fisticuffs until they were separated by my friend and others.
This was back in 2015, when Phillips was already a thorn in the side to the Russophobic establishment. He has spent years with the Donetsk people’s militia, men (and some women) who took up arms against their oppressors, having military experience from conscription in their youth, or defectors from the Ukrainian army.
Phillips earned respect from his hosts for his bravery in reportage, accompanying fighters as bullets whizzed past. He was on the frontline of the Battle of Debaltseve, a vital road and rail junction where government troops were forced to retreat after three weeks of street fighting, with heavy losses on both sides.
When the Kiev government broke the Minsk accords in 2014 and 2015, the West did nothing. It was not until this year that Putin’s patience finally ran out. By then, about fourteen thousand had died in the uneven conflict. Aware of a coming offensive by the heavily armed Ukrainian forces, the Russians moved into the Donbas, supported by the resistance in Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts.
Phillips, like his American counterpart Patrick Lancaster, filmed the scenes and interviewed citizens which Western media failed to cover. If you took the BBC for the truth, you wouldn’t know that Russian soldiers are treated as saviours by residents of cities such as Mariupol and Sevierodonetsk, Showing the trail of destruction after its retreat, Phillips accused the Ukrainian army of war crimes: civilians who tried to evacuate were beaten by the Azov Battalion who blocked all exit roads with destroyed cars (this video was deleted by YouTube).
Here is video of Graham Phillips in Ukraine discussing his persecution in the UK.
When British mercenary Aiden Aslin was captured and prosecuted by the self-declared Donetsk People’s Republic, British media cried foul. When Phillips interviewed the prisoner (with his consent) Tory ministers accused him of a war crime. The Geneva Convention, as they should know, does not apply to mercenaries, who are fair game for captors. In July the UK government included Phillips in its sanctions against Russia and perceived accomplices.
By contrast to other enemies of the state, Phillips has had it easy. Unlike Julian Assange and Tommy Robinson, also persecuted for speaking truth to power, he was abroad and untouchable. Instead, Liz Truss’ would-be war office at Westminster froze his assets and blocked his bank account. This is a radical and dangerous development in our political and social history, although it was given limited attention on mainstream media, apart from outspoken Mail on Sunday columnist Peter Hitchens.
‘Freedom for all means freedom for nasty people’ was the title of the article, although this would not have been of Hitchens’ choosing. Giving credit where it’s due, Hitchens explained the implications of being deprived of access to a bank account. Phillips cannot pay bills, utility supply to his London home will be cut, bailiffs will be buzzing around, and any damage to his property cannot be repaired. His insurance will be annulled. Phillips, if he wanted to challenge his plight in court, could not pay for the air fare – although that’s probably for the best. If he returned he would surely be arrested at Heathrow and thrown into prison without trial.
On YouTube, Phillips remarked on his extra-judicial punishment, and the bypassing of a system of justice built over centuries on the foundations of Magna Carta, as ‘Kafkaesque’.
As Hitchens noted, Phillips has committed no crime. The government’s justification was that he is ‘a video blogger who has produced and promoted content that supports and promotes actions and policies which destabilise Ukraine and undermine or throttle the territorial integrity, sovereignty, or independence of Ukraine.’ The last three years have woken many of us up to the sobering realisation that the law is an instrument of the state to use against inconvenient people. And if the law doesn’t work, another tool may be found, in this case sanctions against a foreign power. Expect more people to be denied access to their savings, because this is a slippery slope.
The post Graham Phillips: British Reporter Is Exiled and Has His Banking Accounts Frozen for Telling the Truth appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Skip The Scoop | Seek Understanding
Murder Suspect Mistakenly Released in NYC
A murder suspect has been wrongfully released from a New York City prison. He was still awaiting trial.
The post Murder Suspect Mistakenly Released in NYC appeared first on NTD.
90,000 Ballots in Largest Nevada County Sent to Wrong Addresses, Bounced Back: Report
More than 90,000 ballots mailed to registered voters in Nevada’s largest county were returned undeliverable, according to an analysis of the election data by a conservative legal group. Clark County, which includes the Las Vegas metro area, made the extraordinary move to mail ballots to all the nearly 1.3 million active voters in the county […]
The post 90,000 Ballots in Largest Nevada County Sent to Wrong Addresses, Bounced Back: Report appeared first on NTD.
The Progressive Democratic Steamroller
The $1.9 trillion spending bill is only a taste of what’s coming.
Hong Kong’s Illusionist
Financial Secretary Paul Chan invokes a system that no longer exists.
Thousands of Orthodox Jews participated in a COVID-19 study last year. The first results are in.
(JTA) — One year after COVID-19 first walloped Jewish communities in the United States, a scientific study has confirmed something that many in the communities have long believed: gatherings during the week of Purim served as superspreader events.
A paper published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open, a peer-review journal that is open to the public, concludes that the coronavirus was spreading widely in Orthodox communities across the country last spring around that Jewish holiday — before public health warnings were given about the dangers of large assemblies.
The paper was peer-reviewed, meaning that its conclusions have been scrutinized and accepted through a rigorous process. Now its authors — four Orthodox Jewish physicians who engineered a study of thousands of blood samples from Orthodox Jews who contracted COVID-19 spanning five states — say their paper has lessons as public health officials steer Americans through the pandemic’s next phase.
“There should be specific recommendations for each religious and ethnic community,” said Dr. Israel Zyskind, a pediatrician in Brooklyn and one of the authors. “They should be culturally sensitive, which is not something we’ve seen with the pandemic, especially early on.”
The post Thousands of Orthodox Jews participated in a COVID-19 study last year. The first results are in. appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Wisconsin state Senator wants Green Bay mayor to resign over handling of November election
The demand for the Green Bay Mayor’s resignation comes after renewed investigations over the November 2020 election.
Alaska becomes first state to allow COVID-19 vaccination residents 16 and older
Only the Pfizer vaccine is FDA approved for those 16 and older.
Senate confirms Merrick Garland as Biden’s Attorney General
Garland was confirmed in a 70-30 vote.
Texas Lifts State Mask Mandate Among Other Restrictions as Pandemic Sees Downward Trend
Texas on Wednesday lifted its statewide mask mandate enacted in mid-2020 while also loosening several other restrictions on businesses meant to control the spread of the CCP virus. Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, announced last week in an executive order (pdf) the State of Texas is working towards removing restrictions on businesses and have them […]
The post Texas Lifts State Mask Mandate Among Other Restrictions as Pandemic Sees Downward Trend appeared first on NTD.
Criticizing Public Figures, Including Influential Journalists, is Not Harassment or Abuse
The most powerful and influential newspaper in the U.S., arguably the west, is The New York Times. Journalists who write for it, especially those whose work is featured on its front page or in its op-ed section, wield immense power to shape public discourse, influence thought, set the political agenda for the planet’s most powerful nation, expose injustices, or ruin the lives of public figures and private citizens alike. That is an enormous amount of power in the hands of one media institution and its employees. That’s why it calls itself the Paper of Record.
One of the Paper of Record’s star reporters, Taylor Lorenz, has been much discussed of late. That is so for three reasons. The first is that the thirty-six-year-old tech and culture reporter has helped innovate a new kind of reportorial beat that seems to have a couple of purposes. She publishes articles exploring in great detail the online culture of teenagers and very young adults, which, as a father of two young Tik-Tok-using children, I have found occasionally and mildly interesting. She also seeks to catch famous and non-famous people alike using bad words or being in close digital proximity to bad people so that she can alert the rest of the world to these important findings. It is natural that journalists who pioneer a new form of reporting this way are going to be discussed.
The second reason Lorenz is the topic of recent discussion is that she has been repeatedly caught fabricating claims about influential people, and attempting to ruin the reputations and lives of decidedly non-famous people. In the last six weeks alone, she twice publicly lied about Netscape founder Marc Andreessen: once claiming he used the word “retarded” in a Clubhouse room in which she was lurking (he had not) and then accusing him of plotting with a white nationalist in a different Clubhouse room to attack her (he, in fact, had said nothing).
She also often uses her large, powerful public platform to malign private citizens without any power or public standing by accusing them of harboring bad beliefs and/or associating with others who do. (She is currently being sued by a citizen named Arya Toufanian, who claims Lorenz has used her private Twitter account to destroy her reputation and business, particularly with a tweet that Lorenz kept pinned at the top of her Twitter page for eight months, while several other non-public figures complained that Lorenz has “reported” on their non-public activities). It is to be expected that a New York Times journalist who gets caught lying as she did against Andreessen and trying to destroy the reputations of non-public figures will be a topic of conversation.
The third reason this New York Times reporter is receiving attention is because she has become a leading advocate and symbol for a toxic tactic now frequently used by wealthy and influential public figures (like her) to delegitimize criticisms and even render off-limits any attempt to hold them accountable. Specifically, she and her media allies constantly conflate criticisms of people like them with “harassment,” “abuse” and even “violence.” . . . Read Full Article Here.
House Passes Biden’s $1.9 Trillion COVID-19 Relief Package
The House of Representatives on Wednesday passed the updated version of President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package. The vote was 220-211, with all Democrats voting for the bill except for Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) and all Republicans voting against it. The House passed a version of the bill late last month, followed by the […]
The post House Passes Biden’s $1.9 Trillion COVID-19 Relief Package appeared first on NTD.
GOP Rep. Reed: Biden’s bill sends $1,400 stimulus checks to ‘convicted child molesters’ in prison
“Why does a child molester who is sitting in state prison need $1,400 to buy cigarettes or play video games?” Reed asked.
40 House Republicans Join Democrats to Reject Greene’s Efforts to Delay Stimulus Package
Several-dozen House Republicans joined all Democrats in rejecting Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s (R-Ga.) bid to delay the $1.9 trillion stimulus package.
The post 40 House Republicans Join Democrats to Reject Greene’s Efforts to Delay Stimulus Package appeared first on NTD.
Judicial Watch Sues CDC for Communications with Big Tech on COVID-19
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) seeking records of communications between the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Big Tech about COVID-19.
Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after HHS failed to reply to a September 15, 2020, FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health of Human Services (No. 1:21-cv-00625)). Judicial Watch requested:
Any and all records of communication between CDC officials and/or employees and employees, agents, and/or representatives of Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube concerning, regarding, or relating to COVID-19 related content on company platforms. Such records include, but are not limited to, any advice or instructions issued on disinformation re COVID-19.
The CDC was required to respond to Judicial Watch’s request by October 29, 2020 but failed to do so.
“The public has the right to know about CDC’s involvement in Big Tech’s outrageous censorship of Americans, including doctors, who raise questions about the COVID-19 response,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Biden administration should stop stonewalling and release the records about the CDC’s role in suppressing the free speech of Americans.”
###
The post Judicial Watch Sues CDC for Communications with Big Tech on COVID-19 appeared first on Judicial Watch.
Virginia state investigator alleges intimidation by Democratic Governor Northam’s staff
Plaintiff asks judge to declare her a whistleblower, order her agency to return her to work from her current status of paid leave.
Bannon’s War Room | Morning Edition Hour 1 | Recorded March 10, 2021 | Video: 48 Minutes 36 Seconds
The true divide is not in the GOP, but between Washington and Wall Street versus the rest of the country. Our guests are: Jason Miller, Todd Bensman, Lauren Boebert, Matt Gaetz.
Bannon’s War Room | Morning Edition Hour 2 | Recorded March 10, 2021 | Video: 48 Minutes 28 Seconds
“You could make a little news on Meghan,” President Trump said. “She’s no good. I said she’s no good and now everybody’s seeing it.” Our guests are: Jason Miller.
Bannon’s War Room | Evening Edition | Recorded March 10, 2021 | Video: 48 Minutes 58 Seconds
“A billionaire was invited into the counting room,” Kline said. “And Americans were kicked out.” Our guests are: Maggie VandenBerghe, Phill Kline, Matt Braynard, Mark Krikorian.
It Appears The Children’s Defense Fund Broke The Law & Blatantly Violated It’s 501(c)(3) Restrictions
“Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.” ~ The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations.
The Children’s Defense Fund made this stunningly inappropriate press release: “Statement: The Children’s Defense Fund Applauds Action to Impeach the President in which they asserted highly politically charged and inflammatory accusations. The press release started with, “The Children’s Defense Fund applauds the House of Representatives for voting on Wednesday to impeach the president for a second time, and urges the Senate to vote to convict the president and ensure he can never again hold the power of the presidency.” It goes downhill from there.
Arkansas Governor Signs Pro-Life Bill Into Law That Bans Most Abortions
Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson on Tuesday signed a pro-life bill that bans most abortions in the state. While pro-life supporters hope the measure will encourage the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its landmark Roe v. Wade decision, opponents of the law are seeking to block it before it’s enacted. The pro-life bill, now called the “Arkansas Unborn Child […]
The post Arkansas Governor Signs Pro-Life Bill Into Law That Bans Most Abortions appeared first on NTD.
March 9, 2021 | Nightly News Rebroadcast | Video: 50 Minutes 23 Seconds
The Texas Governor says there is a crisis on the southern border, two important swing states are reforming their election laws, and every single staff member and consultant from the Nevada Democratic Party has quit.
Pfizer Demands Nations Put Up Collateral to Cover Vaccine Injury Lawsuits
Story at-a-glance:
- Pfizer is demanding countries put up sovereign assets, including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings, as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation.
- Argentina and Brazil have rejected Pfizer’s demands. According to legal experts, Pfizer is abusing its power.
- In the U.S., vaccine makers already enjoy full indemnity against injuries occurring from the COVID-19 vaccine under the PREP Act. If you’re injured, you’d have to file a compensation claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which is funded by U.S. taxpayers.
- A significant problem with the CICP is that it’s administered within the Department of Health and Human Services, which is also sponsoring the COVID-19 vaccination program. This conflict of interest makes the CICP less likely to admit fault with the vaccine.
- The maximum CICP payout you can receive — even in cases of permanent disability or death — is $250,000 per person, and you first have to exhaust your private insurance policy before the CICP kicks in.
As reported by New Delhi-based World Is One News (WION), Pfizer is demanding countries put up sovereign assets as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation. In other words, it wants governments to guarantee the company will be compensated for any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it.
As detailed in my interview with Mikovits, the synthetic RNA influences the gene syncytin, which can result in:
- Brain inflammation.
- Dysregulated communication between the microglia in your brain, which are critical for clearing toxins and pathogens.
- Dysregulated immune system.
- Dysregulated endocannabinoid system (which calms inflammation).
Originally published by Mercola.
The post Pfizer Demands Nations Put Up Collateral to Cover Vaccine Injury Lawsuits appeared first on Children’s Health Defense.
Republican National Committee to hold part of annual donor retreat at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
Trump is expected to give a dinner speech to donors.
Republican National Committee won’t comply with Trump order to stop using his name, likeness
The committee says it has “every right” to use Trump’s image.
Bannon’s War Room | Morning Edition Hour 1 | Recorded March 9, 2021 | Video: 48 Minutes 29 Seconds
Boris Epshteyn says Roy Blunt’s retirement is a signal that the establishment knows “MAGA and the Republican Party is one and the same.” Our guests are: Maggie VandenBerghe, Matt Gaetz, Boris Epshteyn.
Publisher halts Cuomo book promotion, citing nursing home inquiry
There are “no plans” to reprint or republish Cuomo’s book, according to publisher.
Arizona and Montana Take Legal Action Against Biden Admin ICE Arrest Regulations
Arizona and Montana are taking legal action (pdf) to block new Biden administration immigration regulations, saying that these would cause negative consequences for the states. The new rules would limit the capability of ICE to detain some illegal immigrants unless they pose a threat to national security, entered through the border after Nov. 1, or committed aggravated felonies. The Biden administration says that the rules don’t impair arresting or deporting people, but the officers in the field would need to request permission from their superiors to arrest people outside of the aforementioned cases. “If asked about the poorest policy choice I’ve ever seen in government, this would be a strong contender,” Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said in a statement. “Blindly releasing thousands of people, including convicted criminals and those who may be spreading COVID-19 into our state, is both unconscionable and a violation of federal law. This must be …
BREAKING: Massive 100,000 Migrants Flooded U.S. Border in Just 4 Weeks.
New numbers, reported by CNN, reveal the biblical scale of the Biden-induced mass migration headed to the U.S. border, with a reported 100,000+ arrests and apprehensions in the past four…
Bannon’s War Room | Morning Edition Hour 2 | Recorded March 9, 2021 | Video: 48 Minutes 37 Seconds
“Joe Biden may be asleep at the wheel, but the car is still moving and it’s coming in our direction.” Our guests are: Maggie VandenBerghe, Matt Gaetz, Michael Yon, Ben Bergquam.
Number of migrant children detained on southern U.S. border has tripled over past two weeks
Over 5,800 unaccompanied children were found at the southern U.S. border in January, roughly 1,000 more compared to Oct. 2020
Tesla Loses More Than $244 Billion in a Month as Rally Fizzles
Shares of Tesla Inc. fell for a fifth consecutive session on Monday, caught in a tech-led selloff that has wiped more than $244 billion off the company’s market value over the last month. High-flying tech stocks, which powered the market’s rebound from the pandemic lows in March last year, have been hit by a one-two […]
The post Tesla Loses More Than $244 Billion in a Month as Rally Fizzles appeared first on NTD.
Bannon’s War Room | Evening Edition | Recorded March 9, 2021 | Video: 48 Minutes 58 Seconds
“The republic is dead,” she said. “It died Nov. 3 and it’s funeral was held on inauguration day.” Our guests are: Maggie VandenBerghe, Nigel Farage, Dr. Peter Navarro, Maura Monyhan.
Judicial Watch Sues for Records of Pelosi Call with Pentagon Chief
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense for records about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s January 8, 2021, telephone call with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense (No 1:21-cv-00593)).
Pelosi acknowledged the call in a January 8 letter to her Democratic colleagues. In the letter, Pelosi purportedly related her discussion with Milley earlier that same day: “This morning, I spoke to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley to discuss available precautions for preventing an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike. The situation of this unhinged President could not be more dangerous, and we must do everything that we can to protect the American people from his unbalanced assault on our country and our democracy.”
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the Defense Department failed to respond to a January 11, 2021, Freedom of Information (FOIA) request for:
- Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to the telephone call between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and General Mark Milley on or about January 8, 2021. This request includes, but is not limited to, any and all transcripts, recordings, and/or summaries of the call, as well as any other records produced in preparation for, during, and/or pursuant to the call.
- Any and all additional records of communication between Gen. Milley and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi between November 1, 2020 and the present.
In a section of the letter headed “Removing the President From Office,” Pelosi also told her colleagues:
As you know, there is growing momentum around the invocation of the 25th Amendment, which would allow the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to remove the President for his incitement of insurrection and the danger he still poses. Yesterday, Leader Schumer and I placed a call with Vice President Pence, and we still hope to hear from him as soon as possible with a positive answer as to whether he and the Cabinet will honor their oath to the Constitution and the American people.
“If Speaker Pelosi’s description of her conversation with General Milley is true, it sets a dangerous precedent that could undermine the president’s role as commander in chief and the separation of powers,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Our new lawsuit aims to uncover truth about the call.”
###
The post Judicial Watch Sues for Records of Pelosi Call with Pentagon Chief appeared first on Judicial Watch.
Chinese Communist Party Violating Every Act Of Genocide Convention New Legal Report Finds.
A new non-governmental legal report finds the Chinese Communist Party guilty of violating every article of the United Nations’ genocide convention. Published by the Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy…
More Media Bias on Guns: CBS’s Magnum PI shows that supposedly if only a gun hadn’t sold a gun illegal man couldn’t have attempted suicide

CBS has been working closely with gun control groups to bias people’s views on gun ownership. In this episode of Magnum PI (Season 3, Episode 10, March 5, 2021), an Army ranger on leave obtains a gun illegally an attempts suicide. Somehow the claim is that if only the gun dealer hadn’t sold the gun illegally, he supposedly wouldn’t have been able to attempt suicide. Most suicides in the US involve guns, but that ignores that there are many close substitute methods of committing suicide.
For example, Vox (March 24, 2018) recently claimed: “Perhaps the reason access to guns so strongly contributes to suicides is that guns are much deadlier than alternatives like cutting and poison.” But this discussion gives a very misleading impression of the effectiveness of different suicide methods. A study looked at 4,117 cases of completed suicide in Los Angeles County during the period 1988-1991, and found that the success rates for stepping in front of a train, taking Cyanide, jumping from a height, or hanging are virtually the same as for a gunshot to the head or a shotgun to the chest. The study also estimated that the amount of pain and discomfort from being hit by a train was about half that of the other two methods. (Click on the pie charts to enlarge.) See discussions #12 through #15 here.
The post More Media Bias on Guns: CBS’s Magnum PI shows that supposedly if only a gun hadn’t sold a gun illegal man couldn’t have attempted suicide appeared first on Crime Prevention Research Center.
Iowa Governor Signs Bill to Limit Absentee and Early Voting, Close Polls Earlier
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Monday signed a bill to limit absentee voting, shorten early voting, and close the polls earlier on Election Day. The Republican-backed law, SF 413, will shorten the state’s early voting period from 29 to 20 days. It also requires most mail ballots to be received by Election Day. Previously, they could arrive by noon on the Monday after the election, if they were postmarked. Voting sites must close at 8 p.m., an hour earlier than before under the law. County auditors or other election officials are banned from sending out unsolicited absentee ballot request forms under the new law. They would also face penalties of up to $10,000 if they do not enforce state election laws or disobey the guidelines from the secretary of state. Under the law, county auditors are not permitted to set up satellite voting sites unless enough residents petition for one. Voters will be …
High Schools to Reopen in New York City
New York City high schools are opening back up this month. The city’s mayor said they have everything they need to bring high schools back strong and safely.
The post High Schools to Reopen in New York City appeared first on NTD.