President Joe Biden is being accused of quid pro quo by attempting to get Saudi Arabia to delay cuts to oil production until after the 2022 midterm elections. The Saudi government issued a public release exposing the attempt, and this could be an impeachable offense for Biden, on par with former President Donald Trump’s calls with Ukrainian leadership that Democrats voted to impeach him over.
Meanwhile, special counsel John Durham is continuing his investigations into the Crossfire Hurricane scandal, and a recent trial exposed that former FBI Director James Comey and former special counsel Robert Mueller lied about key information.
In this live Q&A with Crossroads host Joshua Philipp, we’ll discuss these stories and others, and answer questions from the audience….

Saudis Accuse Biden of Impeachable Offense; Durham Exposes Mueller and Comey Lies | The Epoch Times

News Analysis: With two acquittals, DC-area juries refuse to referee whether informants or FBI were more to blame for Russia collusion ruse. Is a Church Committee-like probe next?

Special Counsel John Durham made a calculated decision to transform his only criminal trials — of Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann and Steele dossier source Igor Danchenko — into forums for telling the story of the FBI’s pursuit of the unsubstantiated Russia collusion narrative.

From pretrial motions and brutal cross-examinations of FBI witnesses to his parting words at the Danchenko trial, Durham telegraphed his disdain for the FBI’s behavior to jurors in the courts of both law and public opinion.

The jury might very well conclude the FBI mishandled the Russia case, the veteran prosecutor declared Monday in his closing argument. “The government is not here to defend the FBI’s performance in these matters,” he added. Such comments gave license to jurors to acquit, as they did in the end.

Moral of the Durham trials: Jurors won’t convict sources if the FBI wanted their bait | Just The News

On Tuesday Igor Danchenko was acquitted on all four charges against him for lying to the FBI.

Danchenko and Christopher Steele made up the entire Trump-Russia narrative and the FBI-DOJ ran with it for years.

Not one of the criminals at the FBI-DOJ who participated in the coup against President Trump will be punished.

My favorite thing about Igor Danchenko is that he was investigated by the FBI as a Russian agent and later was on their payroll as an informant as they were using the false claims he made to Christopher Steele about Trump/Russia to investigate and spy on President Trump. https://t.co/hHh9YZJfkb

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) October 18, 2022

Following the announcement today General Michael Flynn, whose life was ruined by the lies and corruption of the Department of Justice, responded to the jury verdict.

Investigative reporter Paul Sperry, who covered the FBI’s Trump-Russia hoax better than anyone, reported.

Paul Sperry: BREAKING: Gen. Michael Flynn, who was Trump’s national security adviser, told me in the wake of the Danchenko trial, which ended in the acquittal of the anti-Trump dossier fabricator, that Durham should be ashamed of himself for losing another case in the Russiagate scandal. “The whole episode makes the DOJ and FBI look wholly corrupt or wholly incompetent or a combination of the above, neither of which is good for the country and neither instills any confidence in the rule of law for the average citizen,” Flynn said. “It’s disgraceful, and clear evidence exists that treason or certainly fraud occurred by the Clinton campaign and by the leadership inside both organizations. Durham should be ashamed. Whatever his reputation as a thorough prosecutor was is now gone”

The post General Flynn on John Durham: “Whatever His Reputation as a Thorough Prosecutor was, is Now Gone” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trevor Schakohl, DCNF

A federal jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko, a key source of information for the infamous Steele dossier, not guilty of making false statements to the FBI.

Danchenko was found guilty of making false statements to the bureau, the outlet reported, on four occasions in 2017 related to sources of information he gave former British spy Christopher Steele’s Orbis Business Solutions. The Steele dossier, which was later discredited, also served as a major foundation for FBI Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant applications against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

The dossier included claims that Trump’s campaign conspired with Russia, which allegedly blackmailed Trump with footage of him and prostitutes at a Moscow hotel.

District Judge Anthony Trenga dismissed one of the five federal charges against Danchenko Friday, deeming Danchenko’s claim to the FBI that he discussed particular dossier content with former Democratic operative Charles Dolan “literally true,” according to CNN. Dolan testified the previous day that he sent Danchenko content from cable news but falsely told him of a meeting with a “GOP friend.”

Dolan, a former advisor to both Bill and Hillary Clinton who served in the latter’s 2016 presidential campaign, was a source for at least one claim in the Steele dossier.

Steele and his company were paid by the U.S. firm Fusion GPS, which attorneys for Democrats hired to probe Trump, according to CBS News. Earlier this year, the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign agreed to pay $130,000 in a settlement to end a Federal Election Commission probe into whether they misreported funding for research that resulted in the Steele dossier, violating campaign finance law, The Associated Press reported.

Danchenko was a paid source for the FBI from March 2017 to 2020, a court document previously showed. FBI supervisory analyst Brian Auten testified last week during Danchenko’s trial that Steele failed to prove claims in the dossier during an October 2016 meeting in exchange for a $1 million dollar FBI offer, CNN reported.

The FBI and an attorney for Danchenko did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

The Pentagon was targeted in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Pentagon Attacks First Responders

The Pentagon’s diversity, equity and inclusion chief for the agency’s education programs reportedly recommended for children to read a book calling 9/11 first responders “menaces.”

Kelisa Wing, who leads diversity activities at the Defense Department’s education wing and is currently under review for anti-white comments, recommended in 2018 for classrooms to use the book “Between the World and Me,” Fox News reported Monday.

“They were not human to me. Black, white, or whatever, they were menaces of nature; they were the fire, the comet, the storm, which could — with no justification — shatter my body,” Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote in his anti-police book, “Between the World and Me.”

The Pentagon was targeted in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and 184 people were killed there.

As a teacher, Wing listed “Between the World and Me” on a “Social Justice Book List” in a 2018 article for “Digital Promise,” an Obama-era organization that focuses on innovation in education.

“Your classroom materials should be a mirror for your students in which they can see themselves represented,” Wing said in the article.

Pentagon equity head recommended kids to read book calling 9/11 first responders ‘menaces’ | Just The News