The DOJ And Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Sordid History Of Weaponizing The Espionage Act | The Federalist

The record shows that the DOJ is adept at using the Espionage Act as a cudgel to punish its political enemies.

Barely two weeks ago, the lawfare cabal at Just Security, led by Andrew Weissmann, the former senior prosecutor for the Robert Mueller special counsel investigation, released the second edition of their “model prosecution memorandum” to (presumably) help out his former colleagues at the Department of Justice (DOJ). The document seeks to offer up nearly any theory of law to “get Trump.”

Just Security bills itself as “an online forum for the rigorous analysis of security, democracy, foreign policy, and rights,” but in practice, the organization, funded in part by George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, is the legal beachhead of the Trump resistance. Their model document provides 186 pages of “throw the book at him” musings along with 222 separate footnotes and has largely telegraphed the DOJ’s legal strategy. The document is supported by a variety of public and nonpublic allegations (surely a mixture of leaked information and fabricated information if history is any guide). The fact that their roadmap nearly parallels the now-public indictment of former President Donald Trump is surely a coincidence.

Prosecuting Leaks and Foreign Spies

The “document retention” portion of the Espionage Act states:

§793. Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it… (emphasis added)

Prominently in their model prosecution memorandum related to the Espionage Act is the acknowledgment that the statute is typically used for “leaking cases and foreign government spies.” Dismissing the DOJ’s historical circumspection regarding its applicability, the document proceeds to weave together a basis to charge Trump under the statute. It is unclear if the fan fiction roadmap was needed, as the record shows that the DOJ is in fact quite adept at using 18 U.S.C. 793 (e) as a cudgel to punish its political enemies. Take for instance the case of Thomas A. Drake.

Government Cudgels a Political Enemy

Drake Joined the National Security Agency (NSA) as an executive on Sept. 11, 2001. He quickly became concerned about illegal activities, waste, and mismanagement within the agency. Accordingly, he attempted to raise concerns through standard channels and even elevated his concerns to Congress as a whistleblower.

Eventually, after getting nowhere trying to blow the lid off both financial waste and abuse of Americans’ fundamental civil rights via certain NSA surveillance programs, he decided to leak certain controlled information to a media contact. The resulting stories about the Trailblazer program published in The Baltimore Sun in 2006 and 2007 embarrassed Michael Hayden’s NSA.

Our government rewarded his efforts in November 2007 with a raid on his home, initially suspecting him of being the source of the leaks that disclosed the agency’s warrantless wiretapping in a 2005 New York Times expose. He denied having anything to do with those leaks but acknowledged providing unclassified information to The Baltimore Sun.

After the raid of his home, which caused him to lose his job, the government sat on the case for nearly three years before indicting him in April 2010. The indictment levied five counts of willful retention of National Defense Information (the Espionage Act charges), one charge of obstruction of justice, and four counts of false statements, but the case was eventually pleaded to a misdemeanor. At sentencing, the judge excoriated the government, first for wasting the court’s time only to settle the case on the eve of trial for a misdemeanor, and second for jerking around the defendant for as long as they did.

THE COURT: What message is sent by the government, Mr. Welch … when the government dismisses a ten-count indictment a year after indictment, on the eve of trial, after days and days of hearings under the Classified Information and Procedures Act, and in what I find to be an extraordinary position taken by the government, probably unprecedented in this courthouse, for a case of this profile, literally on a Thursday afternoon before a Monday trial, subject to the government to be prepared as you will in a moment to dismiss the entire ten-count indictment and allow the defendant to plead guilty to a misdemeanor?

               …

THE COURT: And as I tell you, as I say to you, Mr. Welch, I find it extraordinary. I even talked to one of my colleagues about it, his career background is similar to mine, I find it extraordinary in this case for an individual’s home to be searched in November of 2007, for the government to have no explanation for a two year delay, not a two and a half year delay, for him to then be indicted in April of 2010, and then over a year later, on the eve of trial, in June of 2011, the government says, whoops, we dropped the whole case. . . .

Full Article | The DOJ And Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Sordid History Of Weaponizing The Espionage Act

Skip The Scoop | Seek Understanding

Canadian Man Jailed After Referring to Biological Daughter by Wrong Pronoun

Show Me

Iowa University Officials Denied Immunity for Targeting Christian Student Group

Show Me

Scotland Passes Hate Crime Law Amid Free Speech Concerns

Show Me

Fresh hope for campus free speech

Show Me

Rallies for Freedom, Peace and Democracy Planned in 40+ Countries

Show Me

Commentary: Your Freedom of Speech Ends Wednesday

Show Me

RE teacher suspended over Prophet Muhammad cartoon ‘defended his right to freedom of speech’

Show Me

Award-Winning Biologist Slams Peter Daszak And WHO COVID Colleagues For Peddling Chinese Communist Party ‘Disinformation.’

Show Me

California theme parks instruct visitors to stay silent on roller coasters to stem COVID-19 spread

Show Me

Colorado loosens COVID restrictions across most of state in major — and likely final — revision of dial

Show Me

Loretto Hospital executive resigns in wake of COVID-19 vaccination scandal

Show Me

No Surge in COVID Two Weeks After Mask Mandate Lifted in Texas

Show Me

Judicial Watch Sues for Records of New York, Pennsylvania COVID-19 Nursing Homes Policies

Show Me

Smokers prioritized for COVID-19 vaccine shots by CDC and Gov. J.B. Pritzker — not by Chicago (LIVE UPDATES)

Show Me

CDC Director Warns of Possible ‘Avoidable Surge’ in Covid Cases

Show Me

Ex CDC director Robert Redfield believes COVID ‘escaped’ from Wuhan lab as early as September 2019

Show Me

Compromised Fauci quick to throw cold water on former CDC chief’s announcement he believes covid escaped from Wuhan lab

Show Me

68-Year-Old Dies After Anaphylactic Reaction to COVID Vaccine as CDC Continues to Ignore Inquiry Into Increasing Number of Deaths

Show Me

Former CDC Director: COVID-19 Escaped From Wuhan Virology Lab

Show Me

Japan rejects China’s offer to provide COVID vaccines for athletes in upcoming Olympic games

Show Me

China’s deception over COVID-19’s origins gets more outrageous every day

Show Me

Pope, citing pandemic effect, cuts pay for cardinals, others

Show Me

Commentary: The Nature of Chinese Communist Party’s Contempt for Us

Show Me

Sinopharm Chairman Claims He Received COVID-19 Vaccine One Year Ago, Has Antibodies

Show Me

Happiness Report: World shows resilience in face of COVID19

Show Me

Judicial Watch Sues for NIH Funding and Other Records Tied to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology

Show Me

1 report, 4 theories: Scientists mull clues on origin of COVID-19

Show Me

China’s COVID-19 Timeline Questioned After Official Claims to Be Vaccinated in March 2020

Show Me

Before COVID Outbreak, Gates Planned Social Media Censorship of Vaccine Safety Advocates With Pharma, CDC, Media, China and CIA

Show Me

WHO Delays Report On COVID’s Origins As China ‘Fights Tooth & Nail Over Each Sentence,’ WHO Advisor Says

Show Me

China Bans UK MPs Over Uyghur Sanctions

Show Me

Did the coronavirus leak from a lab? These scientists say we shouldn’t rule it out.

Show Me

Biden Under Investigation For Breaking The Law Through Executive Orders

Show Me

Most Americans Are Thinking, “Of Course” | “Biden For President 2020” flag flies in Tijuana camp as migrants wait to cross US-Mexico border

Show Me

Sex offenders and MS-13 members caught after illegally crossing the southern border

Show Me

Biden, Not Trump, Driving Border Crisis

Show Me

Former CBP Commissioner: Biden admin’s border policies are ‘against the nation’s best interest’

Show Me

LIVE: Talk with Mike Pompeo: China on the Move & the Breakdown at the Border

Show Me

Lovers Of Falsehoods Must Be Head Over Heels With Jack Dorsey, Big Tech & Big Business | Twitter admits error by censoring photos of detention center at US-Mexico border

Show Me

Hundreds of migrant children detained at border have tested positive for COVID-19: report

Show Me